| 30-Nov-2009 |
![]() |
The Role of Regulators in a More Competitive Postal Market (2009)Alex Kalevi Dieke, James I. Campbell Jr., Nicole Angenendt, Gernot Müller, Alexandre De Streel and Robert Queck. Bonn: Wissenschaftliches Institute für Kommunikationsdienste (WIK), Sep. 2009. A study for DG Internal Market of the European Commission. 372 pages This study was initiated by the European Commission for the purpose of identifying appropriate next steps for the regulators of postal services in the Member States of the European Union (EU) and European Economic Area (EEA) in light of the evolution of postal markets, best regulatory practices, and the ongoing transposition of the Third Postal Directive. Download from this website. 2.1 mb. Bookmarks revised or corrected from the published version by J. Campbell. Download published version from the website of the European Commission, DG Internal Market (http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/post/studies_en.htm).
|
![]() |
Appendices for Study on Universal Postal Service and the Postal Monopoly (2008)James I. Campbell Jr., Robert H. Cohen, Alex Kalevi Dieke, A. Lee Fritschler, Richard R. John Charles McBride, Antonia Niederprüm, John C. Panzar, Christine Pommerening, and Frank A. Wolak. Washington, D.C.: Postal Regulatory Commission, Dec. 2008. A report for the U.S. Postal Regulatory Commission. CD version only, included with published report. The Postal Enhancement and Accountability Act, enacted in December 2006, required the Postal Regulatory Commission to submit a report to the President and Congress within two years on universal postal service and the postal monopoly in the United States. In January 2008, the Commission contracted with the School of Public Policy of George Mason University (GMU) to prepare a series of studies in preparation for its report. The GMU team included A. Lee Fritschler, Professor of Public Policy, GMU; Christine Pommerening, Program Manager, GMU; James I. Campbell Jr., Adjunct Professor, GMU; Robert H. Cohen, Adjunct Professor, GMU; Alex Kalevi Dieke, Department Head, WIK-Consult; Richard R. John, Professor of History, University of Illinois; Chairles McBride, Consultant; John C. Panzar, Professor of Economics, Northwestern University; Antonia Niederprüm, Senior Consultant, WIK; and Frank A. Wolak, Professor of Economics, Stanford University. The studies prepared by the GMU team addressed, inter alia, the legal development and current status of the universal service obligation, the postal monopoly, and the mailbox monopoly; the historical development of universal service; postal reform in other countries; the economics of the universal service and the monopoly laws; public needs and expectations with respect to universal service and the monopolies; and options for future policies. As it turned out, these studies could not be fully completed within the time available. Nonetheless, on 19 December 2008, the Commission submitted its final report to Congress and President. The report included the latest versions of the GMU studies on a compact disc. The studies by the GMU team, as numbered in the final PRC report, and principal authors were as follows. Original versions submitted to PRC unless otherwise indicated. Bookmarks have been corrected or revised from versions submitted to PRC by J. Campbell. Appendix A. Preface. By GMU team. Appendix B. Universal Service Obligation: A Review of the History and Development of the Laws Relating to the Provision of Universal Postal Service. By James I. Campbell Jr. (version B, 19 Dec 2008) Appendix C. Postal Monopoly Laws: The History and Development of the Monopoly on the Delivery of Mail and the Monopoly on Access to Mailboxes. By James I. Campbell Jr. Appendix D. History of Universal Service and the Postal Monopoly. By Richard R. John. Appendix E. Universal Service and Postal Monopoly in Other Countries. By James I. Campbell Jr. and Alex Kalevi Dieke. Appendix F. The Economics of the Universal Service Obligation and the Postal Monopoly. By Robert H. Cohen, Alex Kalevi Dieke, Charles McBride, Antonia Niederprüm, and John C. Panzar. Appendix G. Public Needs and Expectations. By Christine Pommerening Appendix H. Evaluation of Policy Options. By GMU team. Copies of the final report of the Commisison and appendices by the GMU team may also be downloaded from the website of the Postal Regulatory Commission. Report: http://www.prc.gov. |
![]() |
Main Developments in the Postal Sector: 2004-2006 (2006)Antonia Niederprüm, Alex Kalevi, Mark Oelmann, Sonja Schölermann, and James I. Campbell Jr. Bonn: Wissenschaftliches Institute für Kommunikationsdienste (WIK), May. 2006. A study for DG Internal Market of the European Commission. 261 pages. Appendix. 91 pages. This study was initiated by the European Commission for the purpose of gathering information for its third biennial report on the application of the Postal Directive due at the end of 2006. This report summarizes regulatory and market developments in the European postal sector since adoption of the Postal Directive in 1997, with particular emphasis on events since the last major survey of the sector in 2004. Download main report from this website. 1.4 mb. Bookmarks revised or corrected from the published version by J. Campbell. Download appendix to the report from this website. 0.4 mb. Bookmarks revised or corrected from the published version by J. Campbell. Download main report (final published version) from the website of the European Commission, DG Internal Market (http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/post/studies_en.htm). Download appendix (final published version) from the website of the European Commission, DG Internal Market (http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/post/studies_en.htm). |
![]() |
The Evolution of the Regulatory Model for European Postal Services (2005)James I. Campbell Jr., Alex Kalevi Dieke, and Antonia Niederprüm. of the Wissenschaftliches Institute für Kommunikationsdienste (WIK). Bonn: Wissenschaftliches Institute für Kommunikationsdienste (WIK), July 2005. A study for DG Internal Market of the European Commission. 236 pages. This study was initiated by the European Commission for the purpose of envisioning a new approach towards regulation of the European postal sector based on sound regulatory principles. The study identifies seven principles of sound regulatory practice. These principles are used to evaluate the current regulatory model, principally as defined by the Postal Directive. The study concludes the current European model fails to follow sound regulatory principles in key respects. The report then develops a new regulatory model that illustrates how sound regulatory principles could be applied to the postal sector of the future assuming no change in current policy objectives. Finally, the report considers the practicality of using the new regulatory model as a basis for a new postal directive. It suggests that the new regulatory model would have to be modified to accommodate the transitional concerns and alternative policy objectives that must necessarily arise in consideration of a new directive. Download from this website. 1.0 mb. This version includes bookmarks corrected by J. Campbell. Download final published version from the website of the European Commission, DG Internal Market (http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/post/studies_en.htm). |
![]() |
Main Developments in the European Postal Sector (2004)James I. Campbell Jr., Alex Kalevi Dieke, and Antonia Niederprüm. Bonn: Wissenschaftliches Institute für Kommunikationsdienste (WIK), Jul. 2004. A study for DG Internal Market of the European Commission. 217 pages. Appendix. 276 pages. This study was initiated by the European Commission for the purpose of gathering information for its second biennial report on the application of the Postal Directive due at the end of 2004. This study summarizes regulatory and market developments since adoption of the Postal Directive in 1997 with particular emphasis on events taking place since 2001. Download main report from this website. 1.0 mb. Bookmarks revised or corrected from the published version by J. Campbell. Download appendix from this website. 2.4 mb. Bookmarks revised or corrected from the published version by J. Campbell. Download main report (final published version) from the website of the European Commission, DG Internal Market (http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/post/studies_en.htm). Download appendix (final published version) from the website of the European Commission, DG Internal Market (http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/post/studies_en.htm). |
![]() |
Survey on Some Main Aspects of Postal Networks in EU Adhesion Candidate Countries (2003)Alex Kalevi Dieke and James I. Campbell Jr. Bonn: Wissenschaftliches Institute für Kommunikationsdienste (WIK), Jul. 2004. A study for DG Internal Market of the European Commission. Part 1: Overview. 217 pages. Part 2: Country Reports. 229 pages. This study was initiated by the European Commission for the purpose of providing the first comprehensive survey of the postal systems in the ten "accession countries" that joined the European Union in May 2004 and the three "candidate countries" that are being considered for future membership. The accession countries were Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovak Republic, and Slovenia. The candidate countries are Bulgaria, Romania, and Turkey. Download Part 1: Overview from this website. 1.0 mb. Bookmarks revised or corrected from the published version by J. Campbell. Download Part 2: Country Reports from this website. 1.0 mb. Bookmarks revised or corrected from the published version by J. Campbell. Download Part 1: Overview (final published version) from the website of the European Commission, DG Internal Market (http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/post/studies_en.htm). Download Part 2: Country Reports (final published version) from the website of the European Commission, DG Internal Market (http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/post/studies_en.htm). |